Implicit Learning and SRTs

    Cards (17)

    • Implicit Learning (Saevland and Norman)

      Occurs without full conscious awareness of patterns in learning matter or that learning has occurred
    • Examples of implicit learning
      Riding a bike, learning languages during infancy
    • What is SRT?
      Methodology used to investigate implicit learning where PP presses a key in response to stimuli shown repetitively until a novel sequence is shown
    • What are typical SRT results?
      PP speed up in selecting options, and RT decreases initially, but after a novel sequence, RT becomes longer and slower.
    • Process-dissociation
      SRT process where PP is manipulated using inclusion and exclusion
    • Inclusion manipulation

      PP guesses next stimulus location
    • Exclusion manipulation

      PP avoids guessing the correct next stimulus location
    • What does it mean if inclusion scores are higher than exclusion scores?

      Learning is wholly or partially explicit
    • What does it mean if there is no difference between inclusion and exclusion scores?
      Implicit learning
    • Haider et al (2011) Task?

      Used SRT task where PP picked the colour matching colour of the word to differentiate between explicit and implicit learning.
    • What did an RT drop in Haider et al. 2011 suggest?

      PP having sudden conscious explicit realisation of SRT sequence
    • Haider et al. 2011 Findings

      RT drop got higher percentage correct scores on inclusion trials than on exclusion trials and could explain the training sequence, but non-RT drop got low scores on both trials, showing a lack of explicit learning and could not explain the training sequence.
    • Jimenez and Vasquez 2011 addition to implict vs explict debate
      SE: during dual-task (SRT+2nd implicit task) implicit learning does not require higher cognitive functions
    • Wessel (2012) and Lawson (2017)

      PFC activated during explicit learning
    • 4 reasons why implicit learning findings are inconsistent (Beukema and Verstynen)
      1. IL not localised
      2. Brain systems overlap for the activity of IL + EL
      3. ID - Different learning strategies
      4. B+V found EL uses medial temporal lobe for early stages of learning but, IL uses basal ganglia for early stages of learning.
    • Amnesia patients for SRT (Oudman - 2015)

      The expectation is that they have intact IL but impaired EL but actually, their IL is impaired as they behave slower than CG.
    • Parkinson's PP for implicit learning

      They have damage to the striatum, so it is expected they have impaired EL but intact IL. But they are impaired in both.