The mutant genes mapped in two loci not one. Therefore, there must be at least TWO different genes affecting inducibility, rather than the one gene called i
The second "gene" was eventually called o. In wt cells this would be normal, o+, in constitutive mutants, somehow defective: o- or oc (superscript c for constitutive)
1. Can the various mutants and wild type compensate for their defects if they are crossed with each other
2. Bacteria are haploid – no (normal) sex – no Mendelian experimental crosses: for complementation experiments the second copy of a gene has to be carried into a cell on a plasmid
3. The F' episome or Fertility plasmid was used to carry the test genes
4. The recipient cell then becomes diploid only for the genes in common on the plasmid and chromosome – not for all the genes on the bacterial chromosome – a micro-diploid or partial diploid or merodiploid
1. TRANS-ACTING LOCUS ("gene") synthesizes a protein ("?RNA?" - Monod) molecule = REPRESSOR PROTEIN which specifically binds to CIS-ACTING LOCUS = BINDING SITE ON DNA = OPERATOR SITE
2. REPRESSOR PROTEIN bound to OPERATOR DNA blocks access of RNA Polymerase to PROMOTER: transcription is turned off
3. Small molecule INDUCER (IND) binds to REPRESSOR protein (R) and prevents REPRESSOR binding to OPERATOR DNA
4. RNA Polymerase can now access PROMOTER: Structural Genes transcribed (& translated), enzymes expressed
The gene labelled R for Repressor in this scheme had already been called i or I (for inducibility) before the Lac Operon concept was developed: it was then "too late" to give it the more logical label "R"