The interactionist approach of schizophrenia - Acknowledges there are biological, psychological and societal factors in the development of Schizophrenia
Biological factors:
Genetic vulnerability
Neurochemical + Neurological abnormality
Psychological factors:
Stress
Explaining the interactionist approach: The diathesis-stress model
Both vulnerability and stress-trigger are important to develop the condition
Diathesis - Vulnerability
Stress - negative psychological experience
The diathesis-stress model - Meehl's model
Diathesis is genetic - Schizogene
Development of a biologically based schizotypic personality - Sensitivity to stress
Carriers of the gene - Chronic stress through childhood and adolescence and schizophrenocgenic mother
The diathesis-stress model - Modern understanding of diathesis
Many genes increase genetic vulnerability - No schizogene
Many factors beyond genetic - Psychological trauma
Read et al: Neurodevelopmental model - Early trauma alters developing brain
The diathesis-stress model - The modern understanding of stress
Anything that risks triggering schizophrenia
E.g. Weed usage:
Stressor - Increases risk of S by up to 7 times
Interferes with dopamine system
Must be more - Not all weed smokers develop S after smoking
Treatment according to the interactionist model
Compatible with biological and psychological treatments - Acknowledges both
Combines antipsychotic meds and psychological therapies e.g. CBT
Turkington et et al: Possible to believe biological causes of S and practise CBT to relive psychological symptoms
Britain - Practise to treat people with a combinations of antipsychotic drugs and CBT
USA - Conflict with psychological and biological models
Unusual to treat S with psychological therapies alone
Evaluation of the interactionist approach - Original diathesis-stress model is over-simple
Schizogene and schizophrenic parenting styles - Over-simple
Multiple genes increase S - Small effects on its own
Stress can be in many forms - Including dysfunctional parenting
Vulnerability and stress don't have one single source
Limitation: Problem for old model which still forms the basis of new ones
Evaluation of the interactionist approach - Support for the effectiveness of combinations of treatments
Tarrier et al: Over 300 ppl with S were randomly allocation to medication of CBT, Medication and supportive counselling or a control group (Med only)
Findings - Two combination groups lower symptom levels than med only
Strength: Practical advantage to adopting an interactionist approach with more treatment outcomes - Highlight importance of interactionist approach