Realist approaches are different from other theories of crime because they not only look at the causes of crime but also give practicalsolutions as to how to deal with it
Left Realist view of crime - background
developed during the 1980s and 1990s
follow the Marxist view that society is unequal and this is what causes crime and deviance
they believe gradual change is necessary rather than a violent overthrow of capitalism
left realist view of crime - causes of crime
relative deprivation
marginalisation
subcultures
left realist view of crime - causes of crime
Relative deprivation
LEA AND YOUNG - deprivation is at the root of criminality
1930s poverty was high but crime rates were low
living standards have risen so have people feeling of being deprived compared to others
lead to resentment and people turning to crime to achieve what they are entitled to
left realist view of crime - causes of crime
marginalisation
marginalised groups = people that do not feel they are part of society and lack the goals and organisations to represent their interests
leads to a sense of frustration and resentment amongst those groups - leads to criminal behaviour which they believe will improve their situation
left realist view of crime - causes of crime
Subcultures
Links to the work of CLOWARD and OHLIN and COHEN - blocked opportunities and a groups inability to achieve goals through legitimate means
subculture - collective response to the problem of relative deprivation
criminal subcultures still subscribe to the goals and values of society such as materialism and consumerism - Ghettos in America hooked on Gucci
left realist view on tackling crime
in order to tackle crime you first need to tackle the social problems which lead to crime - causes of inequality and deprivation
policies and strategies should focus on creating better relationships between the public and police - multi-agency approach
left realist view of crime - AO3
MILOVANOVIC - accepts the governments definition of crime being the street crime committed by the poor
interactions - doesn't explain the motives due to reliance on quantitative data
assumes a valueconsensus
relative deprivation cannot explain all crime as not all those that experience it go on to commit crime
right realist view of crime - background
correspond closely with the neo-conservativegovernments
street crime - real and growing problem that destroys communities and undermines social cohesion
less concerned with causes of crime - concerned with practical and realistic solution to crime
right realist view of crime - causes
biological differences
socialisation and the underclass
rational choice
right realist view of crime - causes
biological differences
WILSON AND HERRNSTEIN
biosocialtheory of crime
crime is caused by a combination of biological and social factors
some people are more predisposed to crime through personality traits - aggressiveness, extroversion and risk-taking
poor socialisation and lack of role models
right realist view of crime - causes
socialisation and the underclass
MURRAY
crime rates are increasing due to the growing underclass of people who are dependent upon the welfare state
underclass fails to adequately socialise their children
'glorious revolution' - increase of lone parent families which are inadequate agents of socialisation and teach children to not take responsibility for themselves
right realist view of crime - causes
rational choice
CLARKE
individuals have free will and the power of reason therefore criminals have chosen to commit a crime
if the perceived cost of committing the crime is outweighed by the benefit, people will be more likely to offend
current costs of crime are too low - crime rate has increased
right realist view of tackling crime
do not believe that it is beneficial to tackle the causes of crime - difficult to change
make criminal behaviour lessattractive to people
targethardening - makes it harder for crimes to be committed in the first place
WILSON AND KELLINGSzero-tolerance theory - all criminal behaviour mist be health with immediately
right realist view of crime - AO3
ignores widerstructural causes of crime
overstates rationality of the criminals - this doesn't explain violent to impulsive crimes
contradictory between rationality and bio-social cause of crimes