A method of interviewing witnesses that uses cognitive techniques within a planned structure to overcome problems caused by inappropriate sequencing of questions, which hinders memory retrieval
A Miami woman walking through the lobby of an office building casually noticed two men standing together. Several minutes after her departure, the men murdered a person working in the building.
Consisted of a series of memory-enhancing strategies which produced a breakthrough in the case: The woman reported a clear image of one of the suspects as which she recalled by describing how she noticed that he brushed the hair from in front of his eyes and swept it back off his face.
The interviewer tries to take the witness back to the scene in their memory. To do this they might ask them about their general activities and feelings on the day. This could include asking them about sights, sounds, feelings and emotions, the weather etc..
1. Witnesses are asked to report the incident from the view of someone else who was present. Describing what they think other witnesses (or even the criminals themselves) might have seen.
2. The witness might be asked to describe what they saw in a different order for example 'starting from when you heard the gunfire can you work backwards to when you arrived at the car park'
3. Witnesses are asked to describe absolutely everything that they saw, even if they think that detail is trivial. In this way, apparently unimportant details might act as a trigger for key information about the event.