Research Methods

    Cards (37)

    • What is the purpose of research?

      To test psychology theories and for support
    • What do psychologist do
      They try to explain human behaviour
    • Psychologists develop
      theories and have to work out ways to test their theories, this is why research is needed
    • Lab experiments...
      are ones that are conducted in a highly controlled, sometimes artificial environment
    • Lab experiments do not
      always happen in a laboratory eg in a classroom
    • In a lab experiment, the researcher decides
      Where it happens, when it happens, who participates, what they do and control what to control eg situational factors like temp.
    • In a lab experiment, there is an
      independent (the cause) and dependant (the effect) measured
    • Psychologists carry out lab experiments on

      humans called participants
    • Field experiments is
      carried out in an natural environment
    • Field experiments IVs are
      still manipulated but is done in an environment which is typical to the behaviour being studies
    • In field experiments,

      participants are not aware they are being studied
    • Natural experiments are carried out
      in a natural environment or a lab.
    • Natural experiments IVs

      are not directly manipulated instead it is naturally occuring
    • In Natural experiments researchers
      take advantage of changes to investigate
    • Quasi experiments are carried out
      in a natural environment or a lab
    • Quasi IVs are

      not manipulated, it simply exists
    • Quasi IVs are

      based on existing differences between people
    • Lab experiments summary
      Controlled. IV manipulated. Participants aware
    • Field experiment summary
      Natural environment. IV manipulated. Participants not aware.
    • Natural experiment summary
      Natural or Lab. IV naturally occurring.
    • Quasi experiment summary
      Lab or natural. IV is based on existing differences
    • Evaluating methods
      need to think about what practical, theoretical, or ethical issues may arise when using these methods.
    • Evaluating methods - practical
      time, costs etc
    • Evaluating methods - ethical
      informed consent, confidentiality, right to withdraw etc
    • Evaluating methods - Theoretical
      Validity, reliability
    • Internal Reliability is 

      a measure of consistency within itself, such as whether the different questions in a questionnaire are all measuring the same thing
    • External reliability is
      assuring consistency when different measures of the same thing are compared. Can be improved using standardised procedures
    • Internal Validity is
      extent to which the observed effect was due to experimental manipulation (what you are studying) rather than other factors
    • External validity is

      the extent to which research findings can be generalised beyond research; to other settings and over time
    • Lab experiments strengths
      Well controlled. Extraneous Variables minimised, thus higher internal validity. Can be easily replicated, demonstrating external validity
    • Lab experiment weaknesses
      Artificial, a contrived situation- participants may know they're being studied, materials may lack mundane realism. environment unfamiliar. Therefore participants ay not behave naturally leading to ecological validity.
    • Field experiment strengths
      Less artificial, usually higher ecological validity. Usually higher mundane validity. Participants not aware they be studied.
    • Field experiment weaknesses
      Less control of extraneous variables, reduces internal validity. More time consuming and expensive.
    • Natural experiment strengths
      Allows research where IV can't be manipulated for ethical or practical reasons. Enables psychologist to study real problems such as the effects of disaster on health.
    • Natural experiments weaknesses
      Cannot demonstrate casual relationships because IV not directly manipulated. Random allocation not possible, therefore there may be confounding variables that cannot be controlled, a threat to internal validity.
    • Quasi experiment strengths
      Allows comparison between types of people.
    • Quasi experiments weaknesses
      Can only be used where conditions vary naturally. Participants may be aware of being studied, thus reducing internal validity. DV may be a fairly artificial task, reducing ecological validity.
    See similar decks