perspective

Cards (16)

  • inside the box... a problem-solving approach
    • a pharmacy management tool and a problem solving tool
  • virtue ethics
    • advocated by Aristotle and somewhat St. Thomas Aquinas
    • has had something of a re-birth in last fifty years or so
    • focuses on the inherent character of a person versus their specific acts
    • example (thought process):
    • running a stop sign that is hard to see
    • is it wrong? well, yes
    • does it make you a "bad" person? unethical? and all you prior good deeds count for nothing?
    • no
  • normative ethics
    • a starting point
    • how do you as a pharmacist and pharmacy management answer ethical questions?
    • you will face ethical dilemmas
    • normative -- what you 'should do'
    • what would a reasonable person do
    • components of normative ethics
    • virtue
    • deontology
    • consequentialism
  • deontology
    • posits that decisions/actions be made based on an individuals' duties and rights
    • proponents include Kant, John Rawls, and John Locke
    • Kant believed in a Categorical Imperative
    • a morality based on humanity's rational capacity and certain inviolable moral laws
    • example:
    • you get a prescription for norvasc
    • you're out of the brand but have the generic
    • should you fill the Rx with the generic, not tell anyone and bill for the brand?
    • no... it's wrong... it's fraud... it's unethical
    • even though the generic works just as well
  • consequentialism
    • belief that the morality of an act is based on the result or outcome of the act
    • at least 8 different types of consequentialism
    • such as: welfarism, egoism, situational ethics, intellectualism
  • consequentialism issue
    • the CA assembly has considered in the past paying health care professionals on outcomes, results
    • can you control what a pt does after they leave the pharmacy?
    • some Rx manufacturers are starting to invoice price based on results... especially pricey drugs
  • other types of normative ethics
    • relational ethics
    • founded by feminist theorists such as Carol Gilligan
    • morality arises from empathy, compassion
    • emphasizes relationships in achieving ethical goals
    • it sees issues as contextual and narrative versus formal and abstract
    • pragmatic ethics
    • moral correctness "evolves" over many lifetimes
  • 7 fundamental ethical principles
    • respect for autonomy
    • beneficence
    • nonmaleficence
    • justice
    • proportionality
    • efficiency
    • health maximization
  • terminology
    • non-maleficence: do no harm, even if asked
    • beneficence: heal and help according to ability, judgment
    • health maximization: health outcomes or broader constituency
    • not a micro-encounter
    • can come into conflict with non-maleficence and beneficence
    • efficiency: more health resource needs than resources; always
    • do the most good for the people
    • some moral issues are here
  • terminology (cont.)
    • autonomy: fundamental reminder that every person has a high value
    • leads to tension between individual rights and a "greater" public health good
    • for example: limiting movement during a pandemic
    • justice: answers the question: what do we owe each other?
    • we all have equal moral value and a "different treatment" of some demands a high burden of proof
    • justice demands equal opportunity
    • proportionality: a normative thing; positive features and benefits must be balanced against negative features and benefits
    • casuistic: resolve an issue of conscience with ethical ideas
  • so what?
    • led to an entire industry of "outside of the box" proponents
    • led to the belief that business management, creativity and problem-solving REQUIRED you to think outside the box
    • consultant who pronounced that "outside the box" thinking was critical became multi-millionaires
  • so what? (cont.)
    • conclusion: if only 1 in 4 can solve a problem by thinking outside the box, when they're told how to do it, there's a serious flaw
    • thinking outside the box is not a reliable tool for solving pharmacy management problems
    • most pharmacy management issues can be resolved by thinking inside the box
    • solutions are contained in a small space surrounding the problem, focusing on using resources you already control
    • a management style, a problem solving philosophy and innovation kick start all in one
    • it never has been. it's just a tired, old and (almost) completely WRONG euphemism
  • why should you care?
    • thinking inside the box is a differentiator
    • so, during an interview for a pharmacist/manager's role you REALLY want, you might find a moment to say:
    • "I think most problems w/in a pharmacy can be solved by focusing on resources already at hand"
  • a bioethical management model - a problem solving tool
    • here's a model you can follow if you choose - ECHO
    • economical
    • clinical
    • humanistic
    • outcomes oriented
  • guaranteed exam question
    • what is gross profit?
    • an amount of dollar or percent profit
    • how is it calculated?
    • sell price - (cost/sell price)
    • example: $1 (sell) - 0.50 (cost)/$1 (sell) = 50%
  • another guaranteed exam question
    • how do you figure out net profit?
    • sell cost - cost - (total expenses/sell cost)
    • example
    • $1 - 0.50 - (0.25/$1) = 0.25 and 25%