The energy difference (kcal mol-1) between the lowest energy conformation of a system and the highest energy conformation of a mono-substitubed cyclohexane
Gives a value to the size of a substituent
Can calculate the equilibrium concentrations of axial + equatorial
Atoms are distorted from their ideal bond angles to form a ring
Small rings - 3/4 membered rings
Normal rings - 5-7
Medium rings - 8-14
Large rings - >14
Anomeric effect
Electronegative groups in the 2-position in an O or N-containing ring will adopt an axial position, despite the 1,3-diaxial interactions - allowed by hyperconjugation
Lone pair is able to donate into the vacant 𝛔* orbtial
The effect is reduced in other ring sizes - poor orbital overlap 🠆 sterics dominate
Substituents with a larger A values (more bulky) are more stable in the equatorial position
1,3-diaxial interactions are minimised
Conformational locking
The prevention of ring flipping
Caused by bulky substituents (t-butyl)
Fused rings with trans substituents are conformationally locked
Karplus curve
Relates the 3J coupling constant to the dihedral angle between protons
Larger J values = larger dihedral angle
Irreversible cyclisation
formation of small + normal rings
the aliphatic molecule will contain both an electrophile + nucleophile
the nucleophile must be able to reach the C-LG 𝛔* orbtial for ring closure
3-memerbered rings form via irreversible cyclisation the fastest 3>5>6>>4
the entropic cost increases with ring size - more order is required of chain arrangement
the enthalpic cost decreses withn ring size - small rings are more strained
Revisible cylcisation cannot happen for small rings
Conformations
The different spatial arrangements that a molecule can adopt due to rotation about single bonds