Enable researcher to logically address research question with minimal ambiguity
Play major role in determining scientific value of research study
Aid clinicians in practicing evidence-based medicine; guide health promotion activities and help health administrators make informed decisions re allocation of resources
Advantages: useful for examiningassociations among health-related events; can be used to study several associations at once
Disadvantages: notusefulforrareconditions; cannot generalize to future time points; influenced by response bias; cannot be used to establish cause and effect relationship
Used when data at an individual level is unavailable or, when large-scalecomparisons are needed to studypopulationleveleffect of exposures on a diseasecondition
Type of measures are aggregates of individual level data
Generally used in publichealthresearch; findings are applicable only at the population level
Focus on outcometoexposure (identified by disease and observed for risk factors / exposure)
Two groups of participants: Cases (persons with particular disease or health event) and Controls (persons from general population without disease or health event) who are appropriate match for cases
Used mostly for assessing a newtreatment, two types: treatment trial (e.g. drugs, lifestyle modification) and prevention trial (e.g. exercise programme, vaccine)
RCTs are the most expensive and time-consuming study design, researchers often face issues with the integrity of randomization due to refusals, drops outs, crossovers, and non-compliance, cannot be used if intervention borders on unethical ground
Do not use random assignment, choice of who receives the intervention is decided in some other way, has the potential to introduce selection bias as group allocation is selected by the researcher