The multi-store model was proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968)
Sensory Register:
Capacity = Very Large
Duration = less than 0.5 of a second
Coding = 5 sense
Short Term Memory:
Capacity = (7+-2)
Duration = 18s
Coding = Acoustic
Long Term Memory - MSM
Capacity = Unlimited
Duration = Lifetime (Years)
Coding = Semantic (Meaning)
The Multi Store Model is a structural model which suggests that we have three separate stores in memory
The three stores in MSM differ in terms of coding, capacity and duration
The MSM is an example of an information-processing model because it suggests that information flows through this sequence of stages
The ionic memory is for vision and the echoic memory for sounds
Haptic - Retaining Info about touch
Olfactory memory - Retaining information about smell
Gustatory memory = retaining info from taste
Iconic - retaining information about sight or light
Echoic - retaining information about sound or auditory
Crowder 1993:
Aim: To investigate the coding and duration of the sensory register
Results: Found that sensory register retains information in the iconic store for a few milliseconds, but for two to three seconds within the echoic store
Crowder 1933 - Conclusion:
Supports the idea of sensory information being coded into different sensory stores
Coding: The way information is changed so it can be stored in memory, information enters the brain via our senses. It is then stored in various forms, e.g. visual codes, acoustic codes and semantic codes
Capacity: This is a measure of how much can be held in memory
Duration: A measure of how long a memory lasts before it is no longer available
Baddely (1966):
Aim - to discover how information is coded according to memory model
Baddely (1966) - Method:
Gave different lists of words to four groups of participants to remember:
Acoustically similar (cat, cab, can)
Acoustically dissimilar (pit, few, cow)
Semantically similar (great, large, big)
Semantically dissimilar (good, huge, hot)
PPs had to recall the words in the correct order
Baddely (1966) - Findings:
Did worse with the acoustic information when recalling immediately using their STM. did worse with semantic information when recalling from LTM. Therefore, information coded acoustically in STM and semantically in LTM
Capacity: The amount of information that can be stored in a memory.
Jacobs (1887) - digital span test:
Aim: To measure STM capacity
Method: Researcher reads out four digits and the participants recalls these our loud and in the correct order. if correct, researcher reads out 5 digits and so on until the participant can no longer recall the order correctly
Jacob’s (1887) - digital span test:
Findings: Capacity was nine items for numbers and seven items for letters which shows that capacity of STM is limited
Numbers may be easier to recall as there are only 9 digits whereas there are 26 for letters
Peterson & Peterson (1959):
Aim - To measure STM duration
Method - Given nonsense trigrams (e.g. ZFB) to participants and a 3-digit number. Students counted backwards from this number to prevent mental rehearsal until they were told to stop. Students were told in each trial to stop at different times (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18)
Peterson and Peterson (1959):
Findings - Found that around 90 percentage were recalled accurately in three seconds but only five percent after 18 seconds which suggests STM has a duration of around 18-30 seconds
Sensory Memory:
Encoding - all 5 senses
Duration - limited
Capacity - very large
Short-term Memory:
Encoding - acoustically
Duration - 18-30 seconds
Capacity - 7 (+-) 2
Long-Term Memory:
Encoding - Semantically
Duration - Lifetime
Capacity - Unlimited
Coding, Capacity and duration - PEEL 1:
Strength - Baddely research on coding identifies a clear difference between two memory stores - important step in understanding of MSM
Coding, Capacity and duration - PEEL 2:
Weakness - Baddely research on coding - artificial stimuli - word lists have no personal meaning so would be different to other memories in day to day life
Coding, Capacity and duration - Jacobs‘ capacity research:
study has been replicated with similar results
could be confounding variables - distraction during recall testing
Peterson & Peterson duration:
Weakness - artificial stimuli - study lacks external validity