control- laboratory is an artificial environment where scientists can control different variables in order to discover what effect they have
the experimental and control group- scientist divides up two groups, one exposed to independent variable + one not exposed and conditions kept constant
cause and effect- conditions in group measured, if change is discovered in experimental group a cause and effect relationship is discovered
practical issues of laboratory experiments
open systems- keat argues they are only suitable for studying closed systems where researcher can control and measure all the relevant variables and make precise predictions, society is an open system where countless of factors are at work
individuals are complex
not possible to match the members of the control and experimental groups exactly
no human beings are exactly alike
studying the past
cannot be used to study an event in the past as we cannot control variables acting in the past
small samples
laboratory experiments can usually only study small samples, difficult to investigate large scale phenomena
bring the risk of chance correlation
Hawthorne effect
artificial environment and any behaviour that occurs may be artificial
the expectancy effect
experimenter bias
refers to researcher's expectations may influence experiments outcome
ethical issues for laboratory experiment
informed consent- researcher needs the informed consent of subjects
harm to subjects- some argue minor harm may be justified ethically if results yield significant social benefits
theoretical issues- reliability and hypothesis testingpositivists regard laboratory experiment as highly reliable for 3 reasons:
experimenter can control the conditions and specify the precise steps that were followed in the original experiment- can be easily repeated
produces quantitive data
detached and objective method as subjective feelings and values have effect on the conduct or outcome of experiment
effective way to test hypotheses and predictions
representativeness
laboratory experiments may lack external validity as they may not be true for the wider population
internal validity of laboratory experiments
the artificiality of the laboratory experiment may encourage the hawthorne effect
lack internal validity
interpretivism and free will for lab experiments
interpretivists argue human beings are fundamentally different from plants, rocks as we have free will and choice
behaviour is not caused by outside forces and actions can only be explained by choices we make freely
behaviour cannot be explained in terms of cause and effect relationships
lab experiment is fundamentally flawed with its search for a cause