Intelligence 2

Cards (24)

  • Heritability
    The proportion of variation in a trait that can be attributed to genes, and not the proportion of a trait caused by genes
  • It has been estimated that between 40-80% of current population variance in intelligence scores is due to genetic factors
  • Virtually no psychologists dispute the claim that intelligence is strongly influenced by genetics
  • The "Wilson effect" - Heritability may be higher (.7-.8) in adults compared to children (.45)
  • Caveats around heritability
    • If environment relevant to a given trait changes in a way that affects all members of the population equally, the mean value of the trait will change without any change in its heritability
    • A common error is to assume that a heritability figure is necessarily unchangeable
    • Heritability includes both direct effect of genotype on intelligence and indirect effects where genotype changes the environment, which could lead to overestimation of direct genetic effects and underestimating the environment
  • Flynn Effect
    • IQ norms were changing over time such that when people did older intelligence tests, they would have received a higher IQ
    • Intelligence was rising around 3IQ points per decade from 1932 to 1978
    • Biggest rise in non-verbal (Gf) tests
    • Verbal IQ rise (Gc) 9 points per generation
    • Non-verbal IQ rise (Gf) 15 points per generation
    • Flynn effect may be slowing down or reversing
  • Environmental effects on IQ
    • Nutrition
    • Prenatal factors
    • Smoking
    • Alcohol
    • Other drugs e.g., cocaine, opioids
    • Family environments
  • Bidirectional relationship between intelligence and how children might be treated

    Family environments might enhance or diminish differences between siblings
  • Correlation does not equal causation. E.g., parents with higher intelligence pass both (a) genes and (b) environment down to children
  • Breastfeeding and intelligence
    Good source of nutrients and bioactive compounds that may support brain development and function
  • Mixed effects for brain training. After adjusting for publication bias, only the effect size for processing speed remained significant. Transfer to attention, objective everyday functioning, fluid-intelligence, and visuospatial domains was not significant.
  • Bidirectional relationship with education

    Controversy over effects of early enrichment programs - Gains from Head Start program disappeared after a few years
  • There is mixed evidence for sex differences in intelligence
  • Sex differences in intelligence
    • Slight male advantage on g beginning in adulthood
    • Medium sized advantage for males on spatial intelligence
    • Advantage in emotional intelligence in women
    • Mixed evidence for female advantage in verbal intelligence
    • Greater variability in males - more males at both very high and very low ends of the distributions
  • Possible reasons for sex differences
    • Biological - Hormones, evolutionary arguments
    • Environmental - Stereotypes and stereotype threat
    • Socialisation/learning experiences
  • There is substantial evidence for 'race' differences in intelligence test performance but also substantial debate about the causes
  • Possible causes of race differences in intelligence

    • Test-bias
    • Genetic component
    • Environmental component
    • What is 'race'? Social constructed groups - huge amount of genetic variation within these groups
  • There is no real scientific consensus on the existence, magnitude and causation (e.g., genes or environment) of race and sex differences in general intelligence
  • Bell Curve
    • Argued against social programs for low intelligence people and groups as inefficient use of resources
    • Class is and will become even more so determined in part by genetic factors such as intelligence
  • An acknowledgement of genetic factors could also support progressive policies. Also, hard to determine whether poverty causes low intelligence or low intelligence causes poverty.
  • If intelligence is highly predictive (and probably causal) of positive life outcomes, is there a moral imperative to encourage breeding of highly intelligent individuals and discourage breeding of people of low intelligence?
  • Modern intelligence tests are well-validated, non-biased measures of intelligence
  • g
    A general factor of intelligence
  • Other researchers have introduced models such as Gf/Gc theory, and the CHC three stratum theory