Schaffers stages of attachment

    Cards (9)

    • What was Schaffer and Emersons study?
      Studied 60 Glasgowerian babies for 18 months, mostly from skilled working  class families.
      Mothers/babies were visited once a month for 1 year and then again at 18 months.
      Parents asked to keep diary of observations.
    • Give a strength and weakness of a longitudinal study
      strength-same children were observed and followed up regularly, eliminating individual differences as a confounding variable.
      weakness-families involved were from the samedistrict and social class means that the sample waslimited and could present little generalisibility. Different cultures havedifferent child rearing practise 
    • Give an evaluation point in terms of external validity of the experiment
      Naturalistic observation-behaviour was studied in the environment where it most naturally occurs(parents taking notes within their own homes,own routines)
      -researchers were not present at the time- more natural experiment(generalised to real life settings)
    • Characteristics of multiple attachment.
      Form secondary attachments with familiar adults with whom they spend time (e.g. father, grandparents)
    • Characteristics of specific attachment.
      show stranger anxiety,primary attachmen to one particular individiual,show seperation anxiety.
    • Characteristics of indiscriminatory attachment
      preference for people rather than inanimate objects,happier in presnence of humans than alone,recognise familar faces and use them as secure base.
    • Characteristics of asocial stage.
      prefer faces to non faces, accept comfort from any adult,behaviour between noon objects and humans quite similar.
    • What are the 4 different stages they proposed?
      Asocial,indiscriminate attachment,specific attachment,multiple attachment.
    • What did researchers ask their parents to do?
      asked the parents to observe their children in differentcircumstances, keeping a diary and reporting to researchers.
    See similar decks