romanian orphan

    Cards (32)

    • Rutter (2011) wanted to find the effects growing up in an institution (a public environment) had on children, so he followed 165 Romanian Orphans in a longitudinal natural study. He assessed their physical, cognitive and emotional development at ages 4, 6, 11 and 15 after they had been adopted by British families. This was contrasted to a control group of 52 British children who had been adopted at the same time. 
    • What developmental issues were found in Romanian orphans?
      Severe physical, cognitive, and emotional developmental issues
    • How did the nutritional status of the Romanian orphans affect their IQ?
      They were undernourished and had lower mean IQs depending on the age of adoption
    • What were the mean IQ scores of the Romanian orphans adopted before and after six months?
      Before six months: 102, after six months: 86
    • How do the IQ scores of the Romanian orphans compare to the national average?
      Their IQ scores were much lower than the national average
    • What symptoms did the Romanian orphans show related to attachment?
      Symptoms of disinhibited attachment, such as no stranger anxiety and indiscriminate behavior towards adults
    • What explanation did Rutter provide for the disinhibited attachment observed in the orphans?
      It may have been an adaptation to having multiple caregivers in the institution
    • What are the effects of institutionalization as highlighted by Rutter's findings on Romanian orphans?
      • Severe physical, cognitive, and emotional developmental issues
      • Undernourishment leading to lower mean IQs
      • Disinhibited attachment symptoms
      • Adaptation to multiple caregivers instead of forming specific attachments
    • What is reciprocity in caregiver-infant interactions?
      Interaction where both respond to each other
    • How do infants show reciprocity to caregivers?
      By responding to signals and expressions
    • When do babies start showing reciprocity?
      From birth
    • What do periods of alertness in babies indicate?
      They are more receptive to interaction
    • How often should caregivers detect alertness signals?
      About two-thirds of the time
    • What can stress and distractions cause in caregiver-infant interactions?
      Missed alertness signals
    • How is the interaction between infant and caregiver described?
      As a two-way process
    • What metaphor did Brazelton et al. (1975) use to describe caregiver-infant interactions?
      A 'dance' where each responds to the other
    • What does the reciprocal relationship between infant and caregiver establish?
      Foundations for secure attachment
    • Who devised the Still Face Experiment?
      Tronick (1972)
    • What is the procedure of the Still Face Experiment?
      Caregiver interacts, then shows a still face
    • What happens during the 'still face' phase of the experiment?
      Infants show confusion and distress
    • What is a significant behavior change observed in infants during the Still Face Experiment?
      Loss of postural control
    • What do infants do during the repair phase of the Still Face Experiment?
      They become relieved and responsive
    • What does the Still Face Experiment suggest about infants?
      They seek connection with caregivers
    • What is interactional synchrony?
      Mirroring actions between two people
    • Why is interactional synchrony important?
      It enables secure attachment development
    • What did Isabella et al. (1989) find about synchrony and attachment?
      Higher synchrony leads to secure attachment
    • What was the method used by Meltzoff and Moore (1977) in their study?
      Adult model displayed facial expressions
    • What did Meltzoff and Moore (1977) find about infants' ability to mirror expressions?
      Infants could mirror as young as two weeks
    • What are the strengths of Meltzoff and Moore's study on interactional synchrony?
      • Filmed observations allow later analysis
      • High validity due to infants' unaware behavior
    • What evidence supports Meltzoff and Moore's findings?
      • Murray and Tervarthen (1985) study
      • Infants showed distress when ignored
      • Infants actively sought caregiver attention
    • What are the limitations of using infants in research?
      • Difficult to test behaviors accurately
      • Random limb movements complicate findings
      • Hard to distinguish specific actions from general behaviors
    • What is a limitation of the Still Face Experiment's methodology?
      • Lacks ecological validity
      • Lab setting may exaggerate behaviors
    See similar decks