Graphical representation of the variability of data
Standard deviation
a computed measure of how much scores vary around the mean score
medium variability
Small st dev shows data is close to the mean value
low variability
large st dev shows that there is a wide spread around the mean
coefficient of variation
the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean
t-test
a statistical test used to evaluate the size and significance of the difference between two means
t-value
a ratio of the difference between the two sample means and the standard error
p-value
The probability level which forms basis for deciding if results are statistically significant (not due to chance).
>0.05
not reliable too much difference
<0.05
statistically significant p value and reliable
corellational study
Two variables have a relationship but not necessarily a cause and effect one
r value
The correlation coefficient that ranges from -1.0 to +1.0. The closer it is to 0, the less two variables are related.
R-squared value
Coefficient of determination
Ranges from 0% to 100%
validity
whether or not the test measures the component of fitness it is meant to
accuracy
how closed a measurement is to a correct value/standard
precision
how many decimal places we can record to - more precise = more
reliability
a reliable test produces the same results every time it is repeated - most reliable=most consistent
specificity
fitness test must test an individual's fitness for the activity/sport in question
control groups
group of participants who don't receive the "treatment" in question
randomisation
participants must be randomly assigned to a control/treatment group - balance out factors that could affect the results
placebos
"dummy drug" that appears to be the same treatment but ingredients are different - helps researchers to know whether the drug or placebo is causing the effect
blinding
participant doesnt know which group they are in - reduces bias as participants are more likely to respond
double-blinding
researcher also doesnt know which group the participant was in - reduces researcher bias
importance of the physical activity readiness questionnaire(PAR-Q)
useful for anyone starting an exercise program, determines safety/risk of exercising for an individual based on answers of health history, identifies adults who shouldn't do exercise
field test strengths
more authentic/representative results, tests multiple participants, higher ecological validity, cheaper, qualitative data
field test limitations
less control over variables, environmental constraints, hard to replicate, less accuracy and precision
lab test strengths
more control over variables, most accurate and precise, easy to repeat, high-tech and more advanced
lab test limitations
expensive, slower, less ecological validity
sub-maximal test strengths
safer, better option for diverse populations, can be used to measure fitness over time
sub-maximal test limitations
technique can be a confounding/poorly controlled variable, results must be extrapolated to the max leading to possible erros
maximal test strengths
aims to measure a max
maximal test limitations
injury risk, harder to replicate, more variables to control, requires sufficient rest time, motivation is a confounding variable
health-related fitness
components of physical fitness required to meet the demands of everyday life/activities
health-related fitness components
Body composition, strength, muscular endurance, flexibility, aerobic capacity
performance-related fitness
components required to execute desired skills with success during a sport/physical activity
performance-related fitness components
agility, balance, coordination, power, reaction time, speed
aerobic capacity
the ability to take in, transport and use oxygen through the aerobic energy system - a persons V02 max - the maximal rate that 02 can be used during maximal exercise
bleep test
component: aerobic capacity
how: repeated 20m sprints at progressively increasing speeds until exhaustion is reached
validity: high
reliability: depends on how strictly test is done
advantages: large groups, can continue to maximum
limitations: practice, motivation, environment
Cooper's 12 minute run
component: aerobic capacity
how: running as far as possible in 12minutes
validity: 90% correlation in determining V02 max
reliability: depends on participant
advantages: multiple people, cheap, accessible
limitations: participant validity, motivation
harvard step test
component: aerobic capacity
how: stepping up and down on a bench to a set rhythm for five minutes. Recovery heart rates are then recorded
validity: 60-80% valid measurement of V02 max
reliability: not reliable due to height limitations