Resources are scarce, so we prefer to have them for our group
We separate our group and like our group more
Racial inequalities occur even in places with abundant resources
Classic study by LaPiere (1934)
1. Conducted a field study investigating the relationship between components of prejudice
2. Wrote to 250 establishments asking about serving Chinese people
3. 92% replied 'No', 1% replied 'Yes'
4. Went to these places with a Chinese couple, only 1 place refused to serve them
Authoritarian personality
Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are extensively studied characteristics
RWA and SDO can account for most of the variance observed in prejudice
RWA predicts prejudice towards 'dangerous' groups, SDO predicts prejudice towards 'derogated' and 'dissident' groups
Origins of prejudice
Personality: Some people are more authoritarian than others (Adorno, 1950)
Authoritarian personality results from upbringing, prefer strict rules, conventions, and order, prefer submission to authorities and do not challenge orders
Components of prejudice
Cognitive: Beliefs about the object
Affective: Feelings about the object
Behavioural: Intentions towards the object
Social dominance orientation
Tendency to accept social hierarchies and legitimize them
Belief that those at the top deserve to be at the top
Random grouping
Preference for ingroup present even in experimentally induced artificial groups
Mere categorisation creates ingroup favouritism
New forms of racism
Conflict between deep-seated emotional antipathy towards racial groups and modern egalitarian values
Resulting in denial of racism, prejudice, and discrimination, opposing affirmative action
Disadvantage of segregated groups
Usually a minority
Contact effects typically generalize to the entire outgroup and emerge across a broad range of outgroup targets and contact settings
Solutions to improve intergroup relationships
1. Superordinate goals: groups cooperate in a task with positive interdependence
2. Redrawing category boundaries: redefining members into an inclusive superordinate category
3. Cross-categorisation: social categories crossing each other
Increased contact reduces prejudice
By leading to recognition of similarities between groups
Changing negative stereotypes with sufficient information
Challenging the outgroup homogeneity effect
Research on the contact hypothesis has highlighted five important conditions for favourable outcomes
New forms of racism
Aversive racism: implicit bias and avoidance
Can be measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or experimental paradigms
Racism
Prejudice and discrimination against people based on their ethnicity or race
In the 'Robbers Cave' study, prejudice lessened when hostile groups were forced to cooperate
Meta-analysis of 515 studies revealed an inverse correlation between contact and prejudice
Jigsaw Classroom
Children in jigsaw classrooms perform better and show greater increases in self-esteem than those in traditional classrooms
They show evidence of true integration and better abilities to empathise with, and see the world through the eyes of others
Contact effects typically generalized to the entire outgroup and emerged across a broad range of outgroup targets and contact settings
In Wahdat al Salaam/Neve Shalom (Oasis of Peace), Arabs and Jews have lived together as neighbours since 1970. The children play together, they visit each other's homes, they go to the cinema together. They are friends. ‘The day I visited, the children were making kites in honour of their guest, the author of numerous books for young people, Michael Morpurgo.
Paluck and Green (2009) examined reports of interventions between 2003-08 that had a stated intention of reducing prejudice.
Most pervasive prejudices
Sex
Race
Ethnicity
Age
Sexual orientation
Physical and mental disability
Cairns et al., (2006) analysed data from earlier surveys to test the contact hypothesis on intergroup attitudes of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland. They found that contact was positively related to attitudes toward denominational mixing, trust, and forgiveness, even amongst those most affected by sectarian violence
Legislation and social disapproval have inhibited more extreme expressions of prejudice. Prejudice is more difficult to detect when it is expressed covertly or in restricted contexts, and it may go almost unnoticed as it is embedded in ordinary everyday assumptions, language, and discourse
Prejudice may be a relatively ordinary reaction to frustrated goals, in which people vent their aggression on weaker groups that serve as scapegoats for the original source of frustration. However, by no means can all prejudices be explained in this way
The contact hypothesis has also been supported in cases where Israeli and Palestinian children have been given the chance to grow up together
Prejudice can be considered an attitude about a social group, which may or may not be expressed in behaviour as overt discrimination
The contact hypothesis has underpinned the main policy initiatives in Northern Ireland in an attempt to overcome the segregation and improve relations between Catholics and Protestants (Cairns and Hewstone, 2002)
Jigsaw classroom - Gaertner et al., (1990) suggests that the process is effective because it breaks down in-group and out-group categorization and fosters the notion of class as a single group
Legislation and social attitudes have significantly reduced these prejudices in recent years in most Western nations, but there is still a long way to go
The more contact the lower the prejudice - this finding was not the result of either participant selection or publication bias, and the more rigorous the study the larger the mean effects
Co-operative Learning
To change the atmosphere of the classroom so that it met Allport’s six conditions, Aronson et al., developed the jigsaw classroom
The victims of prejudice can suffer material and psychological disadvantage, low self-esteem, stigma, depressed aspirations, and physical and verbal abuse. In its most extreme form, prejudice can express itself as dehumanisation and genocide