Barriers to entry exist when incumbents are able to exercise market power, but entrants anticipate nonpositive profits
Incumbents often have an incentive to engage in strategic entry deterrence to protect both market power and economic profits
In the Dixit model, incumbents deter entry by overinvesting in capacity, as the costs of capacity are sunk and up to its capacity the MC of the incumbent firm is less than the MC of the entrant, making it credible for the incumbent firm to produce to capacity
Whether strategic entry deterrence in the Dixit model is profitable depends on the relative importance of capital costs and the extent of economies of scale
Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization in the United States, with the offense having two elements: (1) possession of a monopoly and (2) exclusionary or predatory conduct
Perfectly contestable market
Defined by absolutely free entry and absolutely costless exit
Contestable markets are imperfectly competitive markets in which firms face real and potential competition, and the threat of entry from new rivals may be sufficient to keep the industry operating at a competitive price and output
Sunk costs of entry create barriers to entry by exposing the entrant to the risk of nonrecovery, raising the cost of capital for entrants and creating a cost disadvantage vis-à-vis incumbents
Structural barriers to entry
Economies of scale
Product differentiation
Cost advantages
Profit entry deterrence depends on both barriers to entry and the credible threat of aggressive behavior by the incumbent post-entry
The welfare implications of barriers to entry are case specific, as structural barriers to entry or strategic entry deterrence by incumbents may increase or decrease welfare
Two-stage game
Strategic behavior can be fully studied using the framework of two-stage competition
Strategic moves
Set the framework for subsequent competition, with the key feature being commitment
Tactical moves
Correspond to the second stage of the two-stage game, such as prices and quantities, made conditioned on the strategic environment created in the first stage
Strategic substitutes
When the reaction function in the second stage slopes downward
Strategic complements
When the reaction function in the second stage slopes upward
Strategic investment
In the first stage, makes the firm tough if it makes it more aggressive in the second stage, or soft if it increases the profits of rival firms
Taxonomy of equilibria
Top dog
Fat cat
Puppy dog
Lean-and-hungry look
Top dog strategy
The commitment makes the firm tough or aggressive, and strategic variables are strategic substitutes
Fat-cat effect
The commitment makes the firm soft, and strategic variables are strategic complements
If the goal is to deter entry, the only possible equilibria are top dog by overinvesting or lean-and-hungry look by underinvesting
The welfare effects of strategic investment are ambiguous, as even if consumers are made better off, rival firms may be made worse off, and in some cases, consumers will be made worse off
If advertising is persuasive but not informative, in both monopoly and oligopoly equilibrium, the level of advertising will be excessive from a welfare point of view
Other things being equal, an increase in total industry output will be welfare improving, so if advertising causes consumers to purchase more, it can be welfare increasing
When advertising is an exogenous sunk cost, any increase in the sunk advertising investment required to enter the industry will increase the equilibrium level of concentration
When advertising is an endogenous sunk cost, advertising outlays can increase indefinitely as market size increases, but there is a lower bound to concentration below which the market never goes
Predatory advertising
Attracts away the customers of rival firms
Cooperative advertising
Increases demand for all firms in the industry
The use of advertising as an instrument to deter entry depends critically on whether advertising tends to be predatory or cooperative
Advertising
Investment required to enter the industry
Advertising increases
Equilibrium level of concentration increases
Market size increases
Concentration approaches zero in the limit
Endogenous sunk costs
Fixed costs that firms can choose to invest in, which affect the price-cost margin of a firm
Advertising is an endogenous sunk cost
Advertising outlays can increase indefinitely as market size increases, but there is a lower bound to concentration below which the market never goes
Cooperative advertising
Manufacturer helps a retailer pay for cereals
Advertising as an instrument to deter entry
Depends on whether advertising tends more to create goodwill or whether advertising tends to be more to making it softer in its pricing response entry
Goodwill
Intangible asset associated with the purchase of one company by another
Direct strategic costs of advertising
Arise when strategic advertising directly lowers the profits of rival firms, by attracting away their customers
Indirect strategic effects of advertising
Inducing the rival to change its price or output in response to the advertising investment. Ex. Mix & Match of Mcdo and Jabee
Advertising can lead to lower prices in equilibrium, compared to the case where advertising is prohibited