Description and analysis of the costs of drug therapy to healthcare systems and society
Pharmacoeconomicsidentifies, measures, and compares the costs and consequences of pharmaceutical products and services
$3.5 trillion spent on healthcare in 2017, for an average of $10,000 per person, or ~17% to 18% of the gross domestic product (GDP)
Expenditures expected to continuerising each year (esp. gene therapy and biologics)
Pharmacoeconomics at individual patient level
Determining best medication for each patient depending on demographic, clinical and economicconsiderations
Pharmacoeconomics at institutional level
Implementing a clinicalpharmacy service or hiring a clinicalpharmacist
Pharmacoeconomics at hospital system, managed care organization or governmental level
Developing drug use guidelines and formulary system
Pharmacoeconomics overlaps with both healthcare economics and pharmacy-related clinical or humanistic outcomes research
Types of Pharmacoeconomic Studies
Cost-minimization analysis (CMA)
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
Cost-utility analysis (CUA)
Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA)
Simplestto conduct because outcomes are assumed to be equivalent → only the costs of the intervention are compared
CMA cannot be used when outcomes of interventions are different
Appropriate uses of CMA
Comparing two generic medications that are rated as equivalent by the FDA
Comparingdifferentroutesofadministration of the same drug
Comparing the samedrug given in differentsettings
It would not be appropriate to compare different classes of medications using cost-minimization analyses if there are noted differences in outcomes
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA)
Measuresoutcomes in naturalunits (e.g., mm Hg, cholesterol levels, symptom-free days, years of life saved)
Advantage of CEA: Outcomes are easiertoquantify when compared with a CUA or a CBA, and cliniciansarefamiliar with measuring these types of health outcomes because they are routinely collected in clinical trials and in clinical practice
Disadvantage of CEA: Programs with different types of outcomescannotbecompared
CEA may estimate the extra costs associated with each additional unit of outcome (cure, year of life), but nomonetaryamount is placed on the clinicaloutcomes to indicate the value of these outcomes
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
Both costs and benefits are valued in monetary terms
Advantages of CBA
Clinicians can determine whether the benefits of a program or intervention exceed the costsofimplementation
Clinicians can comparemultipleprograms or interventions with similar or unrelatedoutcomes
Disadvantage of CBA: Difficult to place a monetaryvalue on healthoutcomes
Examples of CBA
Evaluation of vaccinations programs
Healthscreening programs
Comparing drugs and/or nondrug treatment options (e.g., diet, exercise, surgery) for a condition
Drug-dependence treatment services
Diagnostic tests
Educational/counseling efforts
Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA)
Compares two or more alternatives based on their costsandoutcomes, where outcomes are measured in units of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs)
Outcomes in CUA are based on yearsoflife that are adjusted by "utility" weights, which range from 1.0 for "perfect health" to 0.0 for "dead"
When morbidityandmortality are both important outcomes of a treatment, CUA should be used to incorporateboth into oneunitofmeasure
Disadvantage of CUA: No consensus on how to measure these utility weights, and they are more of a "roughestimate" than a precise measure
Some researchers consider CUA as a subset of CEA
Cost-consequence analysis (CCA)
Only a listofcosts and a list of variousoutcomes are presented, with no direct calculations or comparisons
Cost-of-illness (COI) analysis
Researchers attempt to determine the totaleconomicburden (including prevention, treatment, losses caused by morbidity and mortality, etc…) of a particular disease on society
The costs included in COI studies are usually summarized into two categories: (1) direct costs and (2) indirect costs
COI studies are used to indicate the magnitudeofresources needed for a specific disease or condition, and they may be used to compare the economicimpact of one disease versus another or the economic impact of a disease on one country compared with another
Opportunity cost
The value of the best-forgone option or the "next best option" - not necessarily the amount of money that changes hands
Resources committed to one product or service cannot be used for other products or services (opportunities)
Price
The amount that is charged to a payer and is not necessarily synonymous with the costoftheproduct or service
Cost Categorization
Direct medical costs
Direct non-medical costs
Indirect costs
Intangible costs
Direct medical costs
The medicallyrelatedinputs used directly to provide treatment
Examples of directmedicalcosts for chemotherapy treatment
Chemotherapyproducts
Medications to reduce side effects
Intravenoussupplies
Laboratorytests
Cliniccosts
Physicianvisits
Direct non-medical costs
Costs to patients and their families that are directlyassociatedwithtreatment but are notmedical in nature
Examples of directnon-medical costs for chemotherapy treatment
Travelcosts to and from the clinic or hospital
Childcareservices
Food and lodging for patients and families
Indirect costs
Costs that result from the lossofproductivity because of illness or death
Examples of indirectcosts for chemotherapy treatment
Time off work for the patient to receive treatment
Reduced productivity due to the effects of the disease or its treatment