Showed participants a grid of 12 letters for 1/20 of a second
Found that on average the participants could only remember 4.32 letters (approx 1/3 of grid)
research for SR capacity: 2nd condition
Sperling
showed his participants another grid of letters, but as
soon as they had seen it he played either a high pitched
tone, middle pitched or low pitched tone, to indicate
whether they had to recall the top, middle or bottom row.
Sperling found that participants recalled on average 3.04
out of the 4 in the row
This suggests that most of the grid was available in the
sensory register (approximately ¾ of the grid, or 9 letters)
This supports the concept of the sensory register and
shows that the capacity of the sensory register is very
large
SR coding?
Modality specific
What is meant by modality specific?
information is stored in the same format as it
was received, as a literal copy
There is a sensory register for each sensory system:
• Iconic store- visual 👀
• Echoic store- auditory 👂
• Haptic store- tactile
• Gustatory store- taste 👅
• Olfactory store- smell 👃
SR duration?
1/2 - 2 seconds
Echoic (auditory) memory is thought to last longer – approx 2 seconds.
• This was shown by Treisman (1964) who presented identical auditory
messages to both ears of participants, with a slight delay between them.
Participants could only identify that the messages were the same if there
was less than a 2 second delay between them
How does information transfer from SR to STM?
Attention
When we focus our attention on a piece of information in
our sensory register it gets passed to STM and we become
aware of it
What is meant by short term memory?
the information that you are currentlyaware
of, the information you have in your mind now
STM capacity?
7+/-2
Research for STM capacity
Miller (1956)- digit span test
One person (experimenter) will receive a list of digits
Partner doesnt know list of digits.
The number of digits increases by one, every
third row.
The experimenter reads out each row of numbers to the
participant, one row at a time and partner should try to repeat back each row
Continue all the way down the rows, putting a tick or cross next to each row on list if partner correctly/incorrectly recalls them all in order.
See to what length list they get before they can’t remember/mistakes are made.
STM coding?
Acoustic
Research for STM coding
Baddeley (1966)
He found that participants had difficulty remembering words that are acoustically similar.
STM duration
15-30 seconds
Research for STM duration
Peterson and Peterson (1959)
read nonsense trigrams (a set of 3 nonsense consonants) to participants, and then got them to countbackwards in threes for varying periods of time (to prevent rehearsal), before they had to recall them. The time periods were 3,6,9,12,15 and 18 seconds.
The longer the delay (without rehearsal) the worst the memory.
How does information transfer from the STM to LTM?
Rehearsal
LTM capacity?
Unlimited
Research for LTM capacity
Wagenaar (1986): during a period of 6 years he kept a
daily record of one or two events of his own day-to-day
life. He recorded over 2400 events and reported good
recall, concluding that many items can be stored in LTM,
supporting the idea that the capacity of LTM is extremely
large or ‘unlimited’.
LTM duration?
Many years
Research for LTM duration
Bahrick et al (1975)
showed participants aged between 17 and 74 yrs a set of pictures of people with their names, some of which were people they had gone to school with.
• Those who had left school 48yrs previously could correctly identify 80% of names of those they had gone to school with, and 70% of faces.
• Showing the duration of LTM can be many years.
LTM coding?
semantic
Research for LTM coding?
Baddeley (1966)
found that words that are semantically similar are more likely to be confused in LTM (similar to the confusion of acoustically similar words in STM).
• This shows that LTM uses a semantic code for words.
Baddeley (1966)
Research for LTM coding
Baddeley (1966)
participants were given the original words in the wrong order. Their task was to rearrange the words in the
correct order.
there was a 20 minute interval between learning and recall. During
which participants performed another task to prevent rehearsal.
participants with semantically similar words (C)
performed the worst with a recall of only 55%. They confused
similar meaning words e.g. recalling large instead of huge. Recall of the other lists was comparatively good at between 70-85%
support for STM using acoustic and LTM using semantic