Factorial Designs

    Subdecks (1)

    Cards (93)

    • When analysing markets, a range of assumptions are made about the rationality of economic agents involved in the transactions
    • The Wealth of Nations was written
      1776
    • Rational
      (in classical economic theory) economic agents are able to consider the outcome of their choices and recognise the net benefits of each one
    • Producers act rationally by

      Selling goods/services in a way that maximises their profits
    • Workers act rationally by

      Balancing welfare at work with consideration of both pay and benefits
    • Governments act rationally by

      Placing the interests of the people they serve first in order to maximise their welfare
    • Groups assumed to act rationally
      • Consumers
      • Producers
      • Workers
      • Governments
    • Rationality in classical economic theory is a flawed assumption as people usually don't act rationally
    • If you add up marginal utility for each unit you get total utility
    • Announcements
      • Test 2: Friday 9 June
      • Lab 2: Friday 16 June
      • Last workshop is on Monday
      • Last lecture is on Friday
    • Aims
      • Rationale of factorial designs
      • Partitioning variance
      • Interaction effects
      • Interaction graphs
      • Interpretation
      • The beauty of these designs is their simplicity, but human behaviour is immensely complex
      • When a study includes more than a single independent variable, the result is called a factorial design, the focus of this lecture
    • Factorial design

      More than one independent/predictor variable has been manipulated
      1. way
      n predictors/independent variables
    • Types of experimental designs
      • Two-way = 2 independent variables
      • Three-way = 3 independent variables
    • Allocation of participants
      • Independent design = different entities in all conditions
      • Repeated measures design = the same entities in all conditions
      • Mixed design = different entities in all conditions of at least one IV, the same entities in all conditions of at least one other IV
    • Main effect
      The overall effect of a single independent variable
    • Interaction
      Shows how the effects of one predictor might depend on the effects of another
    • Factorial ANOVA 2 x 2
    • A factorial design involves all possible combinations of the levels belonging to two or more IVs
    • Example of factorial design
      • Testing the effects of vitamin supplements and exercise on health
    • Interaction effect
      When the effect of one independent variable differs depending on the level of a second independent variable
    • Example of interaction effect
      • Vitamins much more effective when a person also exercises
    • Testing the 'beer-goggles effect'
    • Design: 3 x 2 ANOVA
      IV 1 (Alcohol dose): Placebo, Low dose, High dose
      IV 2 (Face type): Attractive, Unattractive
      Outcome variable: Median rating of attractiveness of 50 photos
    • The data
    • Sum of squares total (SST)

      Calculated as: (xi - xgrand)^2 / (N-1)
    • Sum of squares model (SSM)

      Calculated as: ∑ng(xg - xgrand)^2
    • Sum of squares attractiveness (SSA)
      Calculated as: ∑ng(xg - xgrand)^2 for the face type factor
    • Sum of squares alcohol (SSB)

      Calculated as: ∑ng(xg - xgrand)^2 for the alcohol factor
    • Sum of squares interaction (SSA*B)

      Calculated as: SSM - SSA - SSB
    • Sum of squares residual (error) (SSR)

      Calculated as: ∑sg^2(ng-1)
    • Summary table
    • Main effect of alcohol
      Significant effect of the amount of alcohol consumed on ratings of attractiveness of faces
    • Main effect of face type
      Attractive faces rated significantly higher than unattractive faces
    • Interaction effect
      Significant interaction between amount of alcohol and type of face on attractiveness ratings
    • Interpreting main effects in the context of a significant interaction
    • Combinations of main effects and interactions
    • Example: Trajectory of mothers' perceived stress
      • 2 x 3 mixed factorial design
    • Example: Children's anger/frustration
      • 2 x 3 mixed factorial design
    • Labeling factorial designs
      Label: Size/Independence factorial design
      Example: 2 x 2 between-subjects factorial design, 2 x 3 within-subjects factorial design, 2 x 3 mixed factorial design
    See similar decks