Save
PSYCH211
Factorial Designs
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Kobi
Visit profile
Subdecks (1)
Qualitative Methods
PSYCH211 > Factorial Designs
28 cards
Cards (93)
When analysing markets, a range of
assumptions
are made about the
rationality
of economic agents involved in the transactions
The Wealth of Nations was written
1776
Rational
(in classical economic theory)
economic agents
are able to consider the outcome of their choices and recognise the net
benefits
of each one
Producers act
rationally
by
Selling
goods/services in a way that maximises their
profits
Workers act
rationally
by
Balancing
welfare
at work with consideration of both
pay
and benefits
Governments act
rationally
by
Placing the
interests
of the people they serve first in order to maximise their
welfare
Groups assumed to act
rationally
Consumers
Producers
Workers
Governments
Rationality
in classical economic theory is a
flawed
assumption as people usually don't act rationally
If you add up
marginal
utility for each unit you get
total
utility
Announcements
Test
2
: Friday 9 June
Lab
2
: Friday 16 June
Last workshop is on
Monday
Last lecture is on
Friday
Aims
Rationale
of factorial designs
Partitioning
variance
Interaction
effects
Interaction
graphs
Interpretation
The beauty of these designs is their
simplicity
, but human behaviour is immensely
complex
When a study includes more than a
single
independent variable, the result is called a factorial design, the
focus
of this lecture
Factorial
design
More than one
independent
/predictor variable has been
manipulated
way
n
predictors
/
independent
variables
Types of experimental designs
Two-way
=
2
independent variables
Three-way
=
3
independent variables
Allocation of participants
Independent
design = different entities in all conditions
Repeated
measures design = the same entities in all conditions
Mixed
design = different entities in all conditions of at least one IV, the same entities in all conditions of at least one other IV
Main effect
The overall effect of a single
independent
variable
Interaction
Shows how the effects of one predictor might
depend
on the effects of another
Factorial ANOVA
2 x 2
A factorial design involves all possible combinations of the
levels
belonging to two or more
IVs
Example of factorial design
Testing the effects of
vitamin supplements
and
exercise
on health
Interaction effect
When the effect of one independent variable
differs
depending on the
level
of a second independent variable
Example of
interaction effect
Vitamins
much more effective when a person also
exercises
Testing the
'beer-goggles effect'
Design: 3 x 2 ANOVA
IV 1 (Alcohol dose):
Placebo
,
Low dose
, High dose
IV 2 (Face type):
Attractive
,
Unattractive
Outcome variable: Median rating of
attractiveness
of
50 photos
The
data
Sum of squares total (
SST
)
Calculated as:
∑
(xi - xgrand)^2 / (
N-1
)
Sum
of squares model (
SSM
)
Calculated as:
∑ng
(
xg
- xgrand)^2
Sum of squares attractiveness (SSA)
Calculated as: ∑ng(xg - xgrand)^2 for the
face type factor
Sum of squares
alcohol
(SSB)
Calculated as: ∑ng(
xg
- xgrand)^2 for the
alcohol
factor
Sum of squares interaction (
SSA
*
B
)
Calculated as:
SSM
-
SSA
- SSB
Sum of squares
residual
(error) (SSR)
Calculated as: ∑sg^
2
(ng-1)
Summary
table
Main effect of
alcohol
Significant effect of the amount of
alcohol
consumed on ratings of
attractiveness
of faces
Main effect of face type
Attractive faces rated significantly higher than
unattractive
faces
Interaction effect
Significant interaction between amount of
alcohol
and type of face on
attractiveness ratings
Interpreting main effects in the context of a significant
interaction
Combinations of
main effects
and
interactions
Example: Trajectory of mothers' perceived stress
2
x
3
mixed factorial design
Example: Children's anger/frustration
2
x
3
mixed factorial design
Labeling factorial designs
Label:
Size
/
Independence factorial
design
Example: 2 x 2 between-subjects factorial design, 2 x 3 within-subjects factorial design,
2
x
3 mixed factorial design
See all 93 cards